Comments on: OSM: Is This Legal? https:/2011/04/osm-is-this-legal/ Developer resources for the X-Plane flight simulator Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:56:01 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1 By: Ben Supnik https:/2011/04/osm-is-this-legal/#comment-2063 Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:56:01 +0000 http://www.x-plane.com/blog/?p=3330#comment-2063 In reply to Atrawog.

Right – and if there is an equivalent to the European DB law in the US, I am not aware of it, which means you get considerable “legal shear” across borders even among large Western capitalist economies.

Plus, I don’t know how it is in Europe, but in the US, litigation isn’t a determination of correct adherence to the law, it’s a battle of attrition where money is the ammunition. A small company like LR doesn’t have the resources for a protracted battle – our staff is so small that hauling one of us in for depositions is nearly equivalent to seeking an injunction on all business activity. So the IP law provides a framework for companies to club each other, but it doesn’t necessarily provide a useful source of protection to everyone.

]]>
By: Atrawog https:/2011/04/osm-is-this-legal/#comment-2062 Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:50:58 +0000 http://www.x-plane.com/blog/?p=3330#comment-2062 In the happy days a couple of years ago all we had was copyright laws and copyleft licenses like GPL V2 or CC-SA-BY that regulated how to deal with copyright in an open way. Then the whole intellectually property mess started and things like software patents in the USA and the European database directives started to pop up.

So we now have GPL V3 that handles software patents and the new ODbL that deals with the European database laws.

The European database directive is one of the weirdest laws imaginable, because it allows protections to databases even if all of their content is based on freely available data, but its still something you have to deal with.

]]>
By: Ben Supnik https:/2011/04/osm-is-this-legal/#comment-2030 Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:56:36 +0000 http://www.x-plane.com/blog/?p=3330#comment-2030 In reply to Robin Peel.

Hard to say…part of the airports are factual (this is the runway number, this is the airport name) but some of it is more like a composition (this is my WED line drawing of the taxiways). It sort of falls between. I’d recommend keeping with GPL because it protects the more important parts and everyone understands it.

]]>
By: Ben Supnik https:/2011/04/osm-is-this-legal/#comment-2029 Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:31:23 +0000 http://www.x-plane.com/blog/?p=3330#comment-2029 In reply to Denver.

Yes, this is not really on topic. Sorry, I can’t play 20 questions regarding all aspects of the global scenery, particularly the ones that aren’t finalized yet.

]]>
By: Denver https:/2011/04/osm-is-this-legal/#comment-2028 Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:25:46 +0000 http://www.x-plane.com/blog/?p=3330#comment-2028 This is not really the topic but since you talk about SRTM elevation data: are we going to have improved elevation data in europe and especially Switzerland (in google earth the mesh are extremely thin)?

]]>
By: Ben Supnik https:/2011/04/osm-is-this-legal/#comment-2027 Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:00:06 +0000 http://www.x-plane.com/blog/?p=3330#comment-2027 In reply to anonymous.

No idea – please see the other comments re: distribution. We have no idea yet what the future of non-release DSFs is, nor are we committing to anything now, having not had time to give it appropriate examination. It’s something we’ll certainly look into after v10 ships.

]]>
By: anonymous https:/2011/04/osm-is-this-legal/#comment-2024 Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:35:52 +0000 http://www.x-plane.com/blog/?p=3330#comment-2024 So will we have a server like FlightGear’s TerraSync?

]]>
By: Robin Peel https:/2011/04/osm-is-this-legal/#comment-2022 Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:48:59 +0000 http://www.x-plane.com/blog/?p=3330#comment-2022 Hmmm – maybe we should switch the apt/nav data to the ODbL licence? It’s under the GPL right now, but the ODbL seems to make more sense for pure data.

– Robin

]]>