It will be much appreciated 🙂
]]>First, if the tech press stuff is correct, you can go turn on DSR without app intervention. We’re certainly not planning to do anything to support it.
And…from what i can tell, DSR isn’t a whole lot different from what we do with 4x SSAA in HDR mode. I would expect the performance hit would also be almost exactly the same; the technical description of DRS I found is “render the image bigger and down-size” – that’s exactly what HDR SSAA does. (In nerd lingo, our SSAA is called OGSSAA for ‘ordered grid’, which just means the sub-sample points aren’t rotated).
So my expectation is: you won’t get better speed. You might get better performance; for example, their down sampling filter might be better tuned. But this is just a small fraction of the cost of the anti-aliasing.
]]>This is why I think we need an auto-checker in WED – it’s really really really hard to find these errors by hand!!
]]>Hi Ben, I found the error after 2 days of searching with a fine toothcomb using WED. It was indeed an overlap. The scenery came from FS2004 and was probably converted using a conversion tool. I had a great learning curve. Your link above helped a lot.
thanks
Ralph
Others have responded to this more eloquently than I was going to…I was just going to write something snarky like “don’t fix bugs in other people’s features, implement MY feature!”. 🙂
I do agree that the bezier S curve bug was a small one and people want visibility badly. But the result of the S-curve bug is a major regression bug in 1030, so now it’s important.
]]>That is weird that it is in markings-1 and not taxiways or something…
]]>I’ll try to post one next time I have one open in WED.
This link is super-old but has a few pics of fubar beziers:
http://scenery.x-plane.com/library.php?doc=apt_guidelines.php
]]>I’ve given the X-Plane library’s custom pavement a try, wanted to use some asphalt for runway shoulders and such, but I noticed that all custom pavement is in layer group ‘markings -1’, which kind of seems to negate the flexibility the layer system was designed for in the first place 😉
Would it be possible to put them in a layer group between taxiways and runways, e.g. ‘taxiways +3’ or ‘runways -3/-4?’
I realize this will affect airports that rely on the current layering, but I doubt that it will be many…
anyway, I like the WED validating stuff 🙂
]]>